Evidence, Probabilities and Naive Bayes

Help Yourself - Sign Up

Download this notebook

Evidence, Probabilities and Naive Bayes

Welcome! This workshop is from WinderResearch.com. Sign up to receive more free workshops, training and videos.

Bayes rule is one of the most useful parts of statistics. It allows us to estimate probabilities that would otherwise be impossible.

In this worksheet we look at bayes at a basic level, then try a naive classifier.

Bayes Rule

For more intuition about Bayes Rule, make sure you check out the training.

Following on from the previous marketing examples, consider the following situation. You have already developed a model that decides to either show and advert, or not show an advert, to a set of customers.

Your boss has come back with some results and says:

“We’re going to ask you to develop a new model, but first we need a baseline to compare against. Can you tell me what is the probability that a customer will buy our product, given that they have seen your advert?".

We notice the word “given” in the sentence and we release that we can use bayes rule:

$p(B \vert A) = \frac{p(B) \times p(A \vert B)}{p(A)} = \frac{p(B) \times p(A \vert B)}{p(B) \times p(A \vert B) + p(notB) \times p(A \vert notB)}$

Where $A$ is being shown the advert and $B$ is buy our product.

Next, she provides the following statistics from the previous experiment:

  • 10 people bought product after being shown the advert. (TP)

  • 1000 people were not shown the advert and didn’t buy. (TN)

  • 50 people were shown the advert, but didn’t buy. (FP)

  • And 5 people bought our product without being shown any advert. (FN)

  • 10 true positives. 10 people bought product.

  • 1000 true negatives. Not shown advert.

  • 50 false positives. They didn’t buy, but were shown the advert.

  • 5 false negatives, people bought even though they weren’t shown the advert.

pn
Y1050
N51000
TP = 10
TN = 1000
FP = 50
FN = 5
total = TP+TN+FP+FN
p_buy = (TP+FN)/total
p_ad_buy = TP/(TP+FN)
p_notbuy = (TN+FP)/total
p_ad_notbuy = FP/(TN+FP)
p_buy_ad = p_buy * p_ad_buy / (p_buy * p_ad_buy + p_notbuy * p_ad_notbuy)

print("p(buy|ad) = %0.1f%%" % (p_buy_ad*100))
p(buy|ad) = 16.7%

Naive Bayes Classifier

Now let’s try a naive bayes classifier. We’re going to use the sklearn implementation here, but remember this is just an algorithm that estimates the probabilities of each feature, given a class. When provided with a new observation we look at those probabilities and predict the probability that this instance belongs to that class.

Note that this implementation assumes that the features are normally distributed and the fit method performs the fitting of the distribution parameters (mean and standard deviation).

from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
from sklearn import metrics
from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB
iris = datasets.load_iris()
iris.data.shape
(150, 4)
gnb = GaussianNB()
mdl = gnb.fit(iris.data, iris.target) # Tut, tut. We should really be splitting the training/test set.
y_pred = mdl.predict(iris.data)
cm = metrics.confusion_matrix(iris.target, y_pred)
print(cm)
[[50  0  0]
 [ 0 47  3]
 [ 0  3 47]]
y_proba = gnb.fit(iris.data, iris.target).predict_proba(iris.data)
print("These are the misclassified instances:\n", y_proba[iris.target != y_pred])
print("They were classified as:\n", y_pred[iris.target != y_pred])
print("But should have been:\n", iris.target[iris.target != y_pred])
These are the misclassified instances:
 [[  1.52821825e-122   4.56151317e-001   5.43848683e-001]
 [  7.43572418e-129   1.54494085e-001   8.45505915e-001]
 [  2.12531216e-137   7.52691316e-002   9.24730868e-001]
 [  4.59552511e-108   9.73514345e-001   2.64856553e-002]
 [  5.69697725e-125   9.58135362e-001   4.18646381e-002]
 [  2.19798649e-130   7.12645144e-001   2.87354856e-001]]
They were classified as:
 [2 2 2 1 1 1]
But should have been:
 [1 1 1 2 2 2]
# Ideally, generate a curve for each target. Do it in a loop.
fpr, tpr, _ = metrics.roc_curve(iris.target, y_proba[:,1], pos_label=1)

plt.figure()
lw = 2
plt.plot(fpr, tpr, color='darkorange',
         lw=lw, label='ROC curve')
plt.plot([0, 1], [0, 1], color='navy', lw=lw, linestyle='--', label='Random')
plt.xlim([0.0, 1.0])
plt.ylim([0.0, 1.05])
plt.xlabel('False Positive Rate')
plt.ylabel('True Positive Rate')
plt.title('Receiver operating characteristic of iris data')
plt.legend(loc="lower right")
plt.show()

png

Tasks

actual canceractual no cancer
diagnosed cancer890
not diagnosed cancer2900
  • Above is a (simulated) confusion matrix for breast cancer diagnosis.
    • What is the probability that a person has cancer given that they have a diagnosis? (Find p(cancer|diag))

Bonus

  • Load the digits dataset from the previous workshop, classify with a naive bayes classifier and plot the ROC curve.
  • Compare that to another classifier

Winder Research logo

EMail

web@WinderResearch.com

Registered Address

Winder Research and Development Ltd.,

Adm Accountants Ltd, Windsor House,

Cornwall Road,

Harrogate,

North Yorkshire,

HG1 2PW,

UK

Registration Number

08762077

VAT Number

GB214263735
© Winder Research and Development Ltd. 2016-2018; all rights reserved.